Comments for SharePoint Rating

Comment on InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 1 by InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 3

InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 3 — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:18:42 +0000

[...] Click here for the first post in this series, and visit us for SharePoint 2010 Training. [...]

Comment on InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 1 by InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 2

InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 2 — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:37:08 +0000

[...] Rating Module « InfoPath and SharePoint 2010: Part 1 [...]

Comment on Rating Module by admin

admin — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:52:34 +0000

Yes, it does work. Please post the error here.

Comment on Rating Module by Anand

Anand — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:47:32 +0000

Does this solution works for WSS 3.0, throwing error when deployed.

Comment on Rating Module by Vamsi Krishna

Vamsi Krishna — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:41:09 +0000

Request to share the Source Code or send the source code to codeprizm@gmail.com

Thanks
Vamsi

Comment on Rating Module by Vamsi Krishna

Vamsi Krishna — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:39:18 +0000

I found the working URL : http://www.sharepointrating.com/rating-module/PHRatingSolution.zip

Comment on Rating Module by Vamsi Krishna

Vamsi Krishna — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:38:00 +0000

Unable to download – 404. Please fix this

Comment on Intuit – when cloud computing does not work by andre

andre — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:10:54 +0000

I agree with all the points you make. With cloud computing it vendor choice becomes extremely important. I believe that the biggest downside of cloud computing is that you do lose control on upgrades. For example, Google recently upgraded Google Docs and removed a number of features. Good luck to you if you depended on those features.

Comment on Intuit – when cloud computing does not work by Michael O'Connor Clarke

Michael O'Connor Clarke — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:04:06 +0000

I work for a company whose entire offering is 100% cloud-based, so: yes, I’m biased, but…

Suggesting that this isolated, though major, incident casts doubt on cloud/online services overall is a bit of a leap.

Personally and professionally, I’d still rather put my trust in vendors whose entire business is based on securing my data, than try to maintain a fully-redundant local system.

Think about it: who’s more likely to have the resources to ensure complete data security, redundancy and multi-tiered backups of critical data – a small business running everything on their C: drive or a major cloud computing vendor of the scale of Google or Salesforce (or Quickbooks)? I know Google can afford way bigger servers and backup systems than I ever could.

And don’t forget the joy of having to install and manage local software upgrades on a PC, wait months or years for new code updates to be released, and move all your data between systems every few years when your hardware starts to crumble.

Again, this is a major outage, impacting many, many customers – but I’m confident the systems will be fully restored in due course. Living with some occasional downtime is still a better option, IMHO, than trying to rebuild/restore everything on a crashed local hard drive.

Comment on Why is SharePoint valuable? by Andy Dale (officetalk) MCSE

Andy Dale (officetalk) MCSE — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:11:43 +0000

I think the term ‘modify your ideas’ is perhaps right but sometimes this isn’t a bad thing to do. Many companies don’t have Document Control Procedures in place and SharePoint can be a good starting point for these.

Regards,
Andy Dale
Information Specialist
Officetalk
Suite 7, Haddons Acre
Station Road, Offenham
Evesham, Worcs
WR11 8JJ
Tel 01386 833 535
Mob 07920445739
Email : andy.dale@office-talk.com
Website : http://www.office-talk.com
Blog : http://andydalesharepoint.blogspot.com/